Janie
Full Member
It looks fun, but I can't help wondering how long before doing the actions stops becoming fun and starts becoming a chore and you just go back to playing it normally.
I'm sure thats the line that Sony are using. Its a pretty easy line to use to make sure that demand is outstripping supply. Every single manufacturer in the world wants demand to be far greater than available supply because it means the price will always be higher. If you can artificially affect the market in that way, you're going to do it. I know I would.
It looks fun, but I can't help wondering how long before doing the actions stops becoming fun and starts becoming a chore and you just go back to playing it normally.
Hmm maybe I'm not being clear.
Blu-Ray = media format being used by PS3 on everything (i.e Games)
Games discs for PS3 = Blu-Ray discs
If Blu-Ray doesn't win (and it may well, who knows, but if it doesn't) you have a games console with media which will not reduce in price, large numbers of Blu-rays discs being created will cost more because less companies will be creating them/supporting them which means the people making games will have a harder time getting the game from there desk onto your PS3, which could mean greater cost, less numbers available (of discs), etc, etc.
Blu-Ray discs are expensive to produce and there is the belief they will become cheaper as the production increases and so they learn, if as a media format it fails it will impact the games as far as I see it.
Or am I wrong and if blu-ray were to fail it would have zero impact on the console/games/production of said games ?
I do understand Blu-Ray as it is right now is not defining of itself but it is a large part of the cost of the PS3 and if you took out Blu-Ray and put in HD-DVD it would have little impact on the games but ... hmmm not sure I can explain myself clearly.
Anyone else get the gist of what I'm saying and can put it clearer ?
Does gaming media shift that much in numbers then ? I have always been under the assumption films shift far more than games in pure numbers
Source
Mission Impossible 3 in a week
High def sales 20,00 (HD-DVD & Blu-Ray)
standard def sales 3.7 million
Which seems to me to put films far above games in numbers (though they always seem so closely guarded I will say it's as much a gut feeling on thing, like walking into blockbusters compared to say looking in GAME). Saying certain sectors though doesn't mean much, it's much more about the total and if films dropped off (dramtically or totally) on blu-ray my gut tells me it would affect games.
Zelda - 100%
Monkey Ball - 95%
Red Steel - 90%
Rayman - if I don't get monkey ball I'll get it
Wii Play - 100%
The reviews on Red Steel often seem to end saying it's a steep learning curve and sword fighting = clunky. I don't really care about the sword fighting I want some FPS fun and Red Steel I think will be better than COD3 even if the movement/aiming box will take some getting used to. Which does remind me, I need to go watch a review of COD before I finalize my pre-order
P.S Just worked out my wireless keyboard is giving up the ghost hope I didn't let too many errors slip by me.
Bah bugger and damn-nation. They aren't reviews there my %'ness on which games I want to get ... bahh take me out and shoot me !
GC was there own proprietary one though from day 1 (part of the reason perhaps it didn't do so well).
And I see Sony as putting it in the PS3 to make sure Blu-Ray wins the war as it'll get more players to more people if all goes there way. They may not be banking on it but they are certainly putting alot into making sure Blu-Ray wins out (perhaps Betamax and UMD still leave them feeling dirty failures), and as a consumer I'm happy getting a games console but not to be a guinea pig for some company. When the winner is clear then sure maybe we'll get an HD TV and a player but it's a huge expense and I'm not keen on getting involved in the slightest in the next VHS/Betamax war.